7 The International Jury Doc. Ing. Hana Gattermayerová, CSc. Czech Technical University in Prague • Department: Building Structures • Function: University Professor, Structural Engineer • Specialty: Building structures Prof. René Maquoi University of Liège • Department: Civil Engineering • Function: Retired (Professor Emeritus) • Specialty: Structural stability, steel and composite construction Dipl.-Ing. (univ) IWE Juergen Hilfinger LGA Bayern KdÖR • Department: Department of Structural Safety • Function: Field Executive • Specialty: Structural engineering Prof. Alain Nussbaumer EPFL/ENAC • Department: Resilient Steel Structures Lab., Civil Engineering • Function: Professor • Specialty: Bridges and fatigue-resistant design, industrial buildings Ir. Dorien Staal Voorbij Prefab • Department: General management • Function: Director • Specialty: Housing, BIM, precast Prof. Ir. Cornelis S. Kleinman Kleinman Holding/HTI • Department: Structural design • Function: Prof. Em. TUE & Board Member of Hoger Technisch Instituut Amsterdam • Specialty: Structural design Ing. PhD. Seddik Sakji Scientific and Technical Center of Building (CSTB) • Department: Safety of Structures and Fire • Function: Engineer R&D, Project Leader • Specialty: Structural and civil engineering, fire resistance engineering Dr. Ass. Prof. Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis University of Leeds • Department: Institute for Resilient Infrastructure, School of Civil Engineering • Function: Assoc. Prof. of Structural Engineering • Specialty: Steel and SCC structures, perforated beams, optimisation techniques, high-rise buildings, seismic-resistant design How were the projects judged? An international jury, from both the academic and professional community, gathered in May 2017 for the evaluation of all submitted projects. The jury took the following characteristics into account: • The technical level of the design, detailing and/or the calculations (doubled points) • The originality and prestige of the project • The attractiveness and completeness of the presentation and the uploaded documentation • The optimal use of the software functionalities and the illustration of a BIM process • The overall impression of the project In each of the 4 categories, one winner and three nominees were selected. From all the participating projects, the jury also chose the “Special Prize of the Jury”.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTgyMDE=